I guess this is a pretty subjective question, but one that I am battling with so I thought I'd seek other viewpoints...
Is a school with a higher decile really better for kids than a school in the middle?
From my limited internet research there seems to be a correlation between a schools decile and the cost of housing in the school's catchment area. Now this is to be expected since "A school's decile indicates the extent to which the school draws its students from low socio-economic communities. Decile 1 schools are the 10% of schools with the highest proportion of students from low socio-economic communities, whereas decile 10 schools are the 10% of schools with the lowest proportion of these students. A school's decile does not indicate the overall socio-economic mix of the school.". I know this says there isn't a definite correlation, but it does seem to follow.
I'm assuming that schools with a higher decile have better facilities than lower decile schools, or am I wrong here?
One thing that does worry me with some of the higher decile schools I've seem stats on, is the large number of scholars enrolled. I've always felt that schools with a few hundred scholars are better since these scholars get more individual attention.
OK, I'll stop rambling now. Just trying to get my head around where we're going to live and be able to balance what we can afford vs what's best for our kids.