So as not to fill up the other thread, then I've split this off. After a post a few weeks ago when I was in Auckland, and not really enjoying it I was told that it was because I was there on a weekday, and needed to spend some time there to get to know it. So I have booked a weekend there. SO when I look at the 101 things to do, in Auckland, then I then get told that I need to leave Auckland (city) to see any of them. I'm a bit confused. I used to live in Woking and 5 best things bout woking were that it was 25 minutes from London, 15 minutes from Guildford, an hour from Portsmouth, half an hour from the north downs and there was a cycle path to Brighton. Th epoint being it was a crappy place and so the best thing about it was that you could escape. I'm now hearing that the list for Auckland is simmilar. So whilst I'm a bumpkin that doesn't like people, then I love Edinburgh, in London the Natural History Museum, Science Museum, Tate modern and most of all National Portrait Gallery would be things I'd recommend to a visitor. Equally in New York then a run around Central Park, the Gugenheim, breakfast at one of the many cafes near the park, etc. But despite asking for those sort of things then I'm getting the feeling that Aukland City doesn't have that to offer. So is the centre just hotels and offices, and it's a city without a heart?
Seriously, help me out here. I don't want to spend the weekend travelling, at least not by anything other than by foot (althoguh I'm happy to walk a fair way).
And this isn't a pop at Auckland, or a wind up. I've heard all about the 'culture' that's missing in NZ outside of Akl, Wellington and ChCh, so point me in the direction of the best way to spend a relaxing semi cultured couple of days in the Supercity.