Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: Problems with the SMC process in Asia

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Malaysia
    Posts
    4

    Default Problems with the SMC process in Asia

    Looks like its a tough road ahead for Asian migrants. Pls read these threads:

    What awaits Skilled Migrants in 2010?
    http://www.immigration.co.nz/new-zea...s-in-2010.aspx

    Update on INZ Shanghai and Beijing
    http://www.immigration.co.nz/new-zea...d-Beijing.aspx

    Work to Residence Policy - is it working?
    http://www.immigration.co.nz/new-zea...-to-Resid.aspx

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    37,832

    Default

    I realize you must only just have found them, but these blog posts have come to light before on the forum, KiwiMali. There has been a reaction from the government to criticism of the process in Shanghai and Beijing, and a resulting change in the numbers of candidates receiving PR.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Sri Lanka --> Wellington
    Posts
    161

    Default

    I realize you are new to this forum, Hello and welcome.

    However as JandM pointed out this topic had been discussed before and following are a couple of old threads on the same subject

    http://www.enz.org/forum/showthread.php?t=29341
    http://www.enz.org/forum/showthread.php?t=29940

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Malaysia
    Posts
    79

    Default

    Agree with JandM as well, KiwMali.
    But what's important is the outcome. To that, if you were to look at the thread I created last week titled "Another straight PR from Shanghai", I briefly mentioned that the approval statistics (which is posted in INZ website monthly) for this financial year to date ie Jul, Aug and Sept 2010 has shown a marked increase in approval versus the whole of last financial year ie from Jul 09 to Jun 10. In fact you can go back many years if you want as it's in excel table.
    Have a look at it
    Cheers

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Malaysia
    Posts
    4

    Default

    Appreciate all comments. Nevertheless, I guess its no harm to highlight this news for sharing :

    Immigration NZ moves to reduce chance of corruption
    http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/ar...ectid=10682893
    "More than 30 staff at the agency have been investigated for misconduct, including fraud and corruption this year and at least seven officials have been sacked.
    The service said all branches in this country and most overseas would no longer accept cash from November 29.

    Only branches in Beijing, Shanghai, Dubai, Jakarta and Moscow would continue to accept cash because they did not have alternatives, he said."

    Immigration investigates 34 staff for misconduct
    http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/ar...ectid=10668817

    Will this result in more pressures for the INZ CO to perform or more pressure for Asian applicants to get PR? or both?

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    New Zealand
    Posts
    46

    Default

    Is this in NZ or Asia or elsewhere ...? The article hasn't mentioned much details i think ...

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    37,832

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by GeorgeV View Post
    Is this in NZ or Asia or elsewhere ...? The article hasn't mentioned much details i think ...
    From the second link given above:

    In a response to a written question from Labour in Parliament, Immigration Minister Jonathan Coleman said that on August 16 the department was investigating 32 allegations "concerning conduct and performance" of immigration staff.

    Two fresh allegations have emerged since, and Immigration New Zealand says 34 cases are now being investigated.

    Eighteen allegations relate to officials in New Zealand, and 16 to staff in branch offices overseas.
    There's mention of a staff member of INZ saying they are all feeling pressured because of the present focus on investigating complaints. I can understand that it must be really unpleasant for honest officials that currently, in their workplace, there is an assumption that they are ALL likely to be doing things wrongly, just because SOME people have been found to be at fault. It's only right that complaints should be investigated, but on the other hand, those who are exonerated should be told, loud and clear, that they have nothing to worry about, so that everyone knows they've been doing a good job.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •