Hello,
INZ has sent me a strongly worded email that raises questions on my integrity. They believe that I do not meet the character requirements as they feel I have taken the assistance of an unlicensed advisor during my EOI and ITA filing process.
The email (in the form of a word document) starts off like this
"We have made an assessment of your application and at this stage we are not satisfied that you meet all the criteria of the SMC immigration instructions to warrant an approval of your application."
And it goes ahead like this
"We note that at this stage you meet the age, qualification, skilled employment, work experience, health, English language and settlement requirements. We have assessed you as being eligible for 130 points.
However, to be eligible for residence to New Zealand, the immigration instructions require you to meet the good character requirements. We have information that suggests that you do not meet the character requirements."
This is not true. I have not taken any immigration advice for my SMC applications process. The above point was raised during our telephonic interview last month and the CO expressed her concern and suspicion as the presentation style (covering letter) of the ITA application matches with that of the unlicensed immigration advisor. I collated the information and certain document templates available on the internet and created a cover letter that briefly summarized my case (5 pages) explaining my claim of the points and an elaborate list of various documents sent along with the application. While I gave them a couple of sites (enz.org is one among them) that appeared at the top of my mind during my interview as my input sources to compile the information and sequence the document, it apparently was not good enough for the CO to be convinced.
While the first half of the INZ document made me feel that they have decided to reject my application, towards the end of the document, it was also mentioned that
"We have not made a decision on your application at this stage. We invite you to make comments or provide further information in response to our concerns.
You may provide further information by 29 March 2013."
While I appreciate INZ's concerns and reasons that had led them to believe that I have used an unlicensed advisor, how do I put forward my case? The only thing that I can think of is to reiterate in writing what I told the CO during my interview. While I can provide links of the sites (Google results for "immigrant visa cover letter" and "Immigrant visa cover sheet", past postings in enz.org etc.) that I referred to and collected data as part of my applications filling process. Beyond this I do not know what more tangible and convincing information that I can put forward as part of my response.
Have any of the fellow forumites experienced a similar situation? Your inputs will be of great help to me.
Thanks and Regards