https://www.rnz.co.nz/national/progr...visa-programme
Minister of Immigration has told INZ he wants processing of SMC applications sped up.....the first glimmer of hope in a long time that this issue is finally on the Minister's radar and we might see some positive action soon?!?
Perhaps this will make them speed up the processing of all visa applications. I hope they don't just increase the waiting time for other categories of visa.
I have finally found the energy to submit a complaint to the ombudsman as well.
So still only moving a month in 4 months, so the hole continues to be dig deeper for them. Here's hoping the minister finally breaking his silence and telling them to start moving has some impact and actually starts moving the queue. A bit rich him telling them to get moving when they still haven't confirmed the nzrp for them to work to. I half expect it to accelerate heavily once that's announced and then come July the brakes slammed back on as they approach the quota early again.
INZ have posted news about their "priority criteria" on their website: https://www.immigration.govt.nz/abou...for-applicants. They have also amended instructions at A16.1 to make this priority criteria "legal" (finally). I'm not sure what this will mean for complaints already made to the Ombudsman. I live in hope that INZ come through on their statement that they will resume allocating applications from the general queue.
Can they do this? Isn't there laws that say they have to process as per the instructions at date of lodgement. Don't get me wrong it's positive news if they actually get the queue moving, just seems wrong they can essentially change the manual on everyone after they've applied.
Last edited by deverett; 24th February 2020 at 07:53 PM. Reason: Their there
I think because it's a "general instruction" rather than an instruction pertaining to a specific category or type of visa that one would be applying under, it's regarded as a sort of 'blanket rule' covering all applications at any time. But I agree that it's wrong that they can just change the rules on a whim like that - particularly when such a specific criteria doesn't seem to have existed at A16.1 ever before.