Great explanation.
So does this mean if someone is out of the country for more than 240 days for 1 block out of 5, they will have to wait for another 1 block year?
e.g.
Becoming resident on 01/02/17
Period 1: 01/02/17 - 01/02/18 - 241 days in NZ > Not in NZ
Period 2: 01/02/18 - 01/02/19 - 241 days in NZ > Not in NZ
Period 3: 01/02/19 - 01/02/20 - 241 days in NZ > Not in NZ
Period 4: 01/02/20 - 01/02/21 - 241 days in NZ < Not in NZ
Period 5: 01/02/21 - 01/02/22 - 241 days in NZ > Not in NZ
Period 6 (Extra): 01/02/22 - 01/02/23 - 241 days in NZ > Not in NZ
So the person shall be eligible in 2023, after being in NZ for 240 days in that block year??
Originally Posted by
Kelerei
Makes sense, given that the Department of Internal Affairs works
backwards from your application date.
Let's say that someone gains residency on January 1st 2020, and applies for citizenship exactly 4 years and 240 days later (which would be August 28th 2024 in this example). The Citizenship Office will then look at the following time periods:
- Period 1: August 29th 2019 to August 28th 2020
- Period 2: August 29th 2020 to August 28th 2021
- Period 3: August 29th 2021 to August 28th 2022
- Period 4: August 29th 2022 to August 28th 2023
- Period 5: August 29th 2023 to August 28th 2024
And assuming no international travel at all, their calculations would come to:
- Period 1: 240 days (as the period August 29th 2019 to December 31st 2019 cannot be counted in this example, due to residency being gained on January 1st 2020)
- Period 2: 365 days
- Period 3: 365 days
- Period 4: 365 days
- Period 5: 366 days (extra day, leap year)
As you can see in this example, the requirement is exactly met (each of the 5 periods is 240 days or more, and the sum of all 5 periods is 1,350 days or more) -- but as the first of the periods is exactly 240 days, this example leaves no margin for error. If the person was out of the country for 5 days between January 1st 2020 and August 28th 2020 (and forgot to consider this, or didn't think they had to consider this), the time spent in Period 1 drops to 235 days, and the presence requirement is no longer met. Sounds like this is what caught you out.
I think the confusion comes in because people believe that the Citizenship Office works forwards from the date residency is gained, but this is not correct: they work
backwards from the date you lodge your application. The only reliable way of calculating one's eligibility is thus to do as the Citizenship Office does: work backwards from the date of application to determine the date ranges of the five periods (as in my example), then calculate presence in each of those periods (making sure all of them are 240 days or more), and if that's good, add them all up to make sure the combined total is 1,350 days or more. This confusion could be solved by the Citizenship Office providing an example, much like mine, on
how to calculate presence -- the
example scenarios provided are somewhat vague in this regard.